My question is this a Canadian cent large bead? If so would it be worth sending it in to be graded? Do I leave the coin in the mint cello or remove it to be sent in? Thank you.
Ken
1965 Large bead proof
1965 Large bead proof
- Attachments
-
- EBY 026.JPG (92.72 KiB) Viewed 7150 times
-
- EBY 029.JPG (57.97 KiB) Viewed 7150 times
-
- EBY 030.JPG (64.66 KiB) Viewed 7150 times
-
- EBY 032.JPG (76.95 KiB) Viewed 7150 times
Re: 1965 Large bead proof
Need to see the reverse to tell what variety it is.
Re: 1965 Large bead proof
Thanks for responding. I will sent a photo of the reverse.
- Attachments
-
- EBY 001.JPG (99.88 KiB) Viewed 7119 times
-
- Posts: 1493
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 7:41 am
- Location: Golden Horseshoe, ONT
Re: 1965 Large bead proof
There are NO post-1960 coins that are worth going to a TPG. The cost to certify, in almost every case, costs more than the coin can/will ever be worth, regardless the grade.
Bill in Burl
Re: 1965 Large bead proof
Thank you. I thought that it was scarce because it was in a mint cello. Thats the only one I found in a mint cello with a large bead. Is this coin considered a proof?
Re: 1965 Large bead proof
Both Large and Small Bead varieties came in the Cello Packs.
Not considered a Proof, they are known as Proof-Like.
As Bill says, not worth sending out. The cost of getting it graded
far exceeds the value of the coin.
Not considered a Proof, they are known as Proof-Like.
As Bill says, not worth sending out. The cost of getting it graded
far exceeds the value of the coin.
Re: 1965 Large bead proof
Thanks for all the help from both of you.